logo

40 pages 1 hour read

Sharon Robinson

Promises to Keep: How Jackie Robinson Changed America

Nonfiction | Biography | Middle Grade | Published in 2004

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Change Through Persistence

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of racism.

This theme begins with Mallie. Unlike her husband, she didn’t run from the racist sharecropping system. She stuck by her family and moved them to the West Coast, and this move reinforced her belief in accountability and responsibility. She didn’t rely on others to improve her environment; she did it herself. Her behavior in California advanced her resolve as she became her family’s breadwinner and teacher, earning money as a domestic worker and instilling principles in her children to help them face the US’s racist norms. If Mallie hadn’t pushed against racism, her children might have had different values, and MLB wouldn’t have had a Jackie Robinson.

Mallie’s beliefs shaped Jackie, turning him into Rickey’s ideal athlete. Sharon explains, “[Rickey] learned that Dad had been raised in a religious home by a mother whose values matched Rickey’s own” (28). Jackie applied the “values” to the racism he experienced while playing for the Dodgers. By not replying to virulent bigotry, Jackie set a composed, dignified example, proving that Black people belonged in MLB and that racism couldn’t knock them out of the league. Jackie’s devotion to integrating baseball helped get more Black players into the league, like his future teammate Roy Campanella. In addition, his dedication expanded his platform, supplying him with the clout to create change in areas beyond baseball. While the subtitle (“How Jackie Robinson Changed America”) is hyperbolic, Jackie’s tenacity and self-control helped change baseball and the society that it mirrors. Jackie’s story showed that white players and Black players could share the same field and that Black and white people could share other spaces too.

Sharon’s comments on the history of the US and racism underscore the theme. She shows how positive change and negative reactions coincide. The Civil War ended slavery and led to new freedoms, but Jim Crow laws maintained the toxic inequality. Sharon highlights several individuals, who (like Jackie and Mallie) didn’t resign themselves to resurgent racist norms. She notes how Ida B. Wells used journalism to confront lynching and how Langston Hughes and other members of the Harlem Renaissance spotlighted the vibrancy of Black culture through literature. Wells, Hughes, and others maintained their belief in equality, and their commitment to expressing the Black condition contributed to changes in how American society viewed Black people.

The Different Methods to Combat Racism

People whom Sharon describes in the biography used many tactics to fight racism. The author avoids a one-size-fits-all solution, underscoring that no single right way exists to fight racism. How a person responds depends on who they are and where they are; the important element is persistence.

Jackie didn’t respond to racism in the Army the same way he did while playing for the Dodgers. In Texas, he stood up to the bus driver, but on the baseball fields, he didn’t reply to racist fans and players. The method related to power. On the bus, Jackie was the passenger, and the driver was in charge—operating the bus—so when Jackie refused to sit in the back of the bus, he countered an oppressive display of power. With the Dodgers, Jackie had the power: He was the star player, so replying to racist fans was beneath him. By ignoring them, he minimized their bigoted influence. With racist players, equity existed since they were both on the field, yet Jackie negated their beliefs through actions. He hit a double when an opposing player threw a black cat at him, proving that racism couldn’t diminish his skills. In other words, as a Dodger, Jackie combated prejudice by excelling on the baseball field.

Separate from the physical action of playing baseball, the body itself can be a tool to combat racism. When fans harassed Reese in Cincinnati, Reese touched Jackie’s shoulder and stayed close to him. Reese wasn’t ashamed to play with Jackie, nor was he scared to touch him. Reese’s action taught fans a lesson: “[T]he fans got the message. They stopped heckling and settled down to watch the game” (41). This scene suggests that people can change racist people not by scolding or banishing them but by modeling an alternative outlook. Reese displayed anti-racism, and the fans, however briefly, adopted his model.

The Tension Between Activism and Capitalism

The deal between Jackie and Rickey’s Dodgers destabilized the boundaries between activism and capitalism. They recognized that tension existed between the two elements and that the relationship wasn’t binary: Rickey could support progress and make money at the same time since the two goals weren’t mutually exclusive. Sharon bluntly depicts Rickey’s goals: “First, he deeply believed in equality and thought it was unfair to keep black ballplayers out of the major leagues. Second, he wanted to build the strongest team that would win games and excite the fans” (27). To make a winning, exciting team, Rickey needed Black players, and he recognized that keeping Black players from contributing to MLB teams like the Dodgers was unfair to the players, the fans (who expect to see the best players), and the investors (since automatically rejecting Black players limited their profits). The logic of capitalism led Rickey to integrate his team. Signing Black players qualified as progress and expansion.

Jackie saw the material benefits of becoming the first Black player in MLB. His economic gains didn’t erase the social progress that he represented, but his activism didn’t exist in a vacuum and thus wasn’t untouched by money. The financial incentives didn’t reside exclusively in the contract. Like many MLB players in the mid-20th century, Jackie didn’t make an exorbitant salary. According to Bucknell University’s study on MLB salaries, Jackie signed for only $5,000 ($67,000 in 2022). However, the Dodgers gave Jackie visibility, and he used the platform to obtain personal benefits and represent positive change. He got a free Mercedes, a book deal, and a starring role in a movie about his life, becoming a profitable celebrity. Rickey exploited Jackie, but Jackie exploited Rickey and baseball.

As Jackie got older, the Dodgers sensed that his value was declining, so they traded him to the Giants. In a sense, they passed along their depreciating commodity to another team. However, Jackie profited from the transaction by instead retiring and monetizing his retirement announcement through a deal with Look magazine. He then used his stardom to secure a high-level corporate job. Meanwhile, he remained involved with activist causes. If Jackie hadn’t been such a successful capitalist, his activism wouldn’t have been as forceful or widespread. His story implies that potent activism requires money.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text